Original Home: A Sermon

I preached this sermon on Sunday, February 22, 2026 at St. Anne Episcopal Church. The lectionary text cited is Genesis 2:15-17; 3:1-7.

One of the truest things I have learned in life is that we don’t fully appreciate home until we have to leave it.  

Now, I’ve moved around a lot—at one point I counted that, thus far in my 42 years, I’ve lived in approximately 28 different dwellings. Which means that on many, many occasions, I’ve engaged in that moving-day ritual of taking one final walk through the now-empty rooms you’re about to vacate.

You check the corners and the closets, making sure you haven’t forgotten anything. You see the nail holes in the walls; you notice the small cracks and scuffs that will soon be the only traces of you left behind. And you realize, in these final glances, that you will never again see that particular slant of light through the window pane ; you will never make dinner in that kitchen or hear familiar footsteps stomp down those stairs. 

And, in my experience, it is always in this moment I feel that maybe I didn’t ever truly appreciate all the life that was lived within these walls. Maybe we just don’t know how to appreciate something fully until it’s time to let it go. 

And so it’s right then, in the moment of departure, that we finally understand the preciousness of what we must now leave behind. 

Why am I going on about this? It’s true, Matt and I are hoping to find a house at some point in the near future, so maybe I’m thinking about move #29. But it’s more so because of our Scripture readings this week, and especially that reading from Genesis, which I think is one of the most fundamentally misunderstood sacred texts there is. Stick with me a minute and you’ll see what I am getting at.

For millennia, this ancient story of Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden has been used to try and explain all of our problems, all of our pain, all the reasons why we need a holy Lenten season and why we are looking for a Savior in the first place.

And the familiar interpretation of the story usually goes something like this: Eve and Adam did a very bad thing. They disobeyed God’s instructions; they ate the fruit that was not for them, and they were punished accordingly. And we, as their descendants, apparently still bear their punishment in every fiber of our being. It’s the notion of original sin, as St. Augustine called it. 

Because of that one primordial mistake, so this interpretation goes, all are inherently guilty and blameworthy, forever and ever. Bad news for us, and so we’d better pray that the God who made us will rescue us from a place of punishment which God also made. 

I confess that this take on the story has always left me unsatisfied, like a phrase that doesn’t quite rhyme. I acknowledge the power of sin, but I also believe that love is the stronger force at work upon us. 

And I especially struggle with the conventional approach to this text and its emphasis on original sin because it has been used, variously, to stereotype women as tempters who lead men astray; to depict creation as something flawed or suspect; and to make people feel guilty for simply being born or for daring to be who God made them to be.

So here’s the thing, and I am probably going to ruffle some theological feathers with this, but so be it: what if there was another way to understand Genesis?

Because I don’t think that original sin or crime and punishment are the primary lenses through which we should view the story of Eden or, frankly, anything else in the Christian story. We can respect them as one lens to consider, but I think we would do well to remember that some of these theologies were developed centuries after the gospels were written, millennia after the origins of the Hebrew Scriptures, and that there are other ways we can engage this text.

And I think you know this about me, but I am always looking for the Good News, for the story of God that speaks a true word to our deepest hopes and longings, and not just one that plays into our insecurities and fears. 

So I’ve been asking myself, if not ‘original sin,’ then what else is this story of Eden really trying to get at? Why does it haunt us, follow us, shape us, even thousands of years on?

And that’s where my reflections on leaving home come to bear.

Maybe the key to the story is not the snake in the grass, or the forbidden fruit, or the blame game between Eve and Adam. Maybe instead it’s that bittersweet moment when their eyes are opened and God tells his children that they have grown too wise for Eden now. That they must go out and make their way into the the world as it is, with good and evil both. 

And I thought of how the two of them, as I myself have done 28 times, must have taken one last glimpse of Eden before they left it. How they might have noticed the cracks in the garden soil or the certain slant of light through the trees. How they might have traced their fingers across the branches and the flowers and the garden gate and realized they would never again call this place home. And that they were therefore the first to understand the preciousness of what we must leave behind. 

And I realized that this longing is our true inheritance from those first ancestors. Eden is not primarily a story about punishment. It is a story about leaving home. 

This makes better sense to me as a foundational human story. Because let’s be honest, we don’t need the Bible to reveal to us that life is full of hardships and compromises. They are all around us, every day.

But it is helpful to know that, hard as life is, all of us carry within us this lingering sense of something deeper, something more true—not an original sin, but an original home. A place that was ours, once. A shelter whose walls and corners and certain slants of light still haunt our dreams. A place that we are trying to find again somehow.

For me, the Eden story tells us that the deepest issue of the human heart is not depravity so much as it is loneliness and lostness. We just want to go home again. To stumble back through the garden gate and collapse into someone’s waiting arms. And what’s expressed in this story of Adam and Eve is the fear that we never can.

If this is true, then the whole texture of the Biblical story begins to reveal itself in a different way.  Suddenly we will see the notion of ‘home’ everywhere: the promise made to Abraham; all the wandering through various wildernesses; the dream of a land of milk and honey; the stories of exile and return; of invasion and liberation; of tumbling walls and rebuilt temples. And finally, the story of Jesus, who stares down the temptations wrought by our deepest insecurities and shows us what home actually is, and where it is: in him. 

And maybe someone is wondering: so what? Why would it matter that we set aside original sin for a minute and read Eden in a different way? Greg mentioned in his sermon on Ash Wednesday that part of Lent is reflecting anew on Scripture, and I would suggest that the stakes of the foundational stories we tell are actually quite significant.

Because consider this: a church shaped only by the notion of our original sin will inevitably become  a Christianity focused on purgation and punishment and a pervasive sense of unworthiness. It will invite us to look into the eyes of our neighbors (and at ourselves) and ask, are you saved, including from your own self? Are you good enough? Are you pure? Do you actually belong here? Or is the seed of the forbidden fruit still on your lips?

But if our life in the church is about seeking home, about walking each other home, as the saying goes, with Jesus as our guide, then perhaps we can simply look into the eyes of our neighbors, and at ourselves, and say, oh yes, my friend, I know what it feels like to be hungry. To be far from wherever you started. I, too, am trying to find my way back. I, too, am still looking for the garden gate and for that certain slant of light. I’m still hoping there is some place where we can truly appreciate life as we live it. A place we don’t have to leave behind. 

So maybe, friends, this Lent, we can look for the way back there together. Maybe we can find home in each other, if nothing else. Maybe that’s what this whole story was trying to tell us all along.

And, call me a heretic if you will, but I think when we can speak less of original sin and more of original home to one another, and believe in it, and try to build it, then wherever they may be, Adam and Eve will breathe a sigh of relief. And they will say to each other: finally, finally, our children understand what it was actually about.

And maybe, just maybe, we’ll make it back to Eden after all. 

The God Who Smiles Back: A Sermon

I preached this sermon on Sunday, February 15 at St. Anne Episcopal Church, West Chester, OH.

I didn’t grow up in a churchgoing family, so there wasn’t any religious art in our house. No pictures of Jesus on the wall or images of the saints. If you have ever visited my office here at church, though, you’ll see that I’ve made up for lost time. I’ve got icons and I’ve got statues and I’ve got drawings of Jesus and of Mary and Jesus with Mary, and I’ve got praying hands and prayer beads and portraits of my favorite saints and on and on and on. And I love it all!

But I noticed something this week as I was sitting in my office ensconced in all that religious imagery. I looked at the images of Jesus and the pictures of the saints—these figures whose lives reveal the inner life of God—and I realized they all shared something in common. 

None of them are smiling. 

Have you ever noticed this in Christian art? I’ve visited European churches and countless museums looking at religious art with all of these depictions of key moments in the story of Jesus, and in nearly every one, the characters do not look happy. 

Mary at the Annunciation often looks like she’s about to say some word other than “Lo” (if you recall my Christmas sermon). And the saints are either in the midst of being martyred or, at best, look a little bit dazed and confused, like I do when the alarm goes off in the morning. 

And Jesus…well, Jesus is almost always depicted as either somber, or sad, or suffering, or stern, or some combination thereof. We’ve got one big image of Jesus in this church, hanging up on the wall behind you, and don’t look now, but I can tell you he’s not having a good day. 

If I try to call to mind a famous image of Jesus smiling or laughing, I struggle. In the long and venerable tradition of sacred art, at best he usually looks rather subdued. 

And maybe it’s just because life feels a little heavy these days and I’m hungry for some joy, but this feels off to me. We just heard the story of the Transfiguration this morning, and I happen to have an icon of the Transfiguration on my bookshelf, so I looked at it. 

Now the Transfiguration is a supremely important moment in the Gospels, a moment when the disciples get to see Jesus as he really is, fully human and fully divine, radiant and beautiful. How exciting! How wondrous!

And yet in this icon, there is Jesus standing on the mountain, in communion with Moses and Elijah, and there are the disciples looking on and everyone looks…downtrodden! Dismayed! They look sort of like I did when I was doing my taxes this week. 

And I thought, my God, what is it within us that tends to depict our faith through the lens of fear or pain or resignation rather than joy and peace and celebration? Isn’t it possible that, on that magnificent mountaintop, Jesus’ smile was as radiant as his garments? Could we dare to believe in a God who smiles sometimes?

Mother Alane said something lovely in last week’s sermon that has stuck with me: that God gave the Law as a gift, as a joy for the people of Israel. Not as a cold stone monument to power. Not as an impersonal set of rules and regulations to suppress human freedom. No, as a joy. As a roadmap of sorts to a place where God and humanity can coexist in deep harmony with one another. And yet, on down through the millennia, too many times we have depicted this Law and our Lord who fulfills it as a rather unsmiling affair. 

Consider the reading from Exodus today. How do you picture Moses in that dark cloud atop Mt. Sinai? Terrified? Trembling? I usually do. But what if he was actually dancing in that cloud? What if the Law was pressed upon his heart in that hidden place like a vow made between two lovers? What if the stone inscriptions he carried down to the people were like a Valentine to humanity? What if he was laughing and crying tears of joy as he scrambled back down the mountainside, unable to contain his delight that at last he knew how to live in harmony with each other and our Creator? 

Perhaps we would smile in the telling of it. 

And what if the same could be said for the Transfiguration? What if Jesus and Moses and Elijah were not holding somber council with one another, as my icon shows, but laughing like old friends reunited after many years? What if the disciples were indeed awestruck by this vision but in that life-giving way, like when the sun breaks above the horizon and you can’t help but gasp and weep for joy at the deep, generous beauty of the world? Why don’t we tell the story like that or paint it like that? 

I am not just trying to be cute or sentimental here. I’m just tired of the fact that, so often, Scripture has been used as instrument of fear and shame and gloom. I think, if the church is to meet the historical moment we’re in, we have to let that go. We have to tell and live a different version of the story. 

I spent years estranged from my faith, believing that God frowned upon everything I am. How much sooner I might have come back if I’d realized that God did, in fact, love me unconditionally, that Jesus could indeed smile upon me, and not just look at me with pain or pity in his eyes. It took a long time before I dared to imagine such a thing. I wonder how many people are out there feeling the same way. I wonder how we can reach them.

Because in too much of the our Christian history, especially among the most powerful institutions, there has been a poverty of joy. A sense that this is all very serious business. And I suppose if a church’s primary motivation were to maintain or wield various forms of cultural force, then it is pretty serious. 

I don’t know about you, though, but I am looking for something different from church. I am not here to win a culture war. I am not here to judge who is worthy and unworthy. I am not here to be an instrument of empire. I am here to be transfigured. I am here to know what real joy feels like, maybe for the first time in my life. I am here to love and be loved, imperfect as I am. I am here to learn to love my neighbor, no matter who they are. I am here to learn how to smile again after a long spell of tears, and I am looking for a God who smiles back. I’m not willing to settle for a Gospel that is anything less than Good News for me, and for you, and for EVERYONE.

I think that’s what the Transfiguration points to, in the end—not just the glory of God revealed, but the joy of God shared. The joy that’s found when we realize the divine light is hiding, not just in Jesus, but within us and everyone we see. That the whole earth, though it may seem saturated with darkness, will ultimately learn to shine again.

Hold onto that vision if you can, especially as we turn towards Lent this coming week. 

So often I hear people say that Lent is all about sorrow and regret and somber things. Nonsense! We’ve probably just been looking at too many religious paintings. There’s no law against smiling in Lent. Sure, we may stop saying Alleluia for a while, we may get a bit quieter and more reflective, but really we are just clearing out some space in our hearts and minds so that we have more room to dance with God.

No matter what you have been taught in other seasons of your life, we do not need to surrender our happiness in order to be a proper Christian. 

Quite the opposite, in fact. The world is starving for an honest, defiant sort of joy. In a culture that so often traffics in platitudes, in cynicism, in discontent…a deep and genuine smile might be the most beautiful, powerful, subversive, transformative thing we can offer people. Our religious art might not always reflect it, but we certainly can. So if you’re looking for a Lenten discipline,  consider offering a kind word or smile to all the people you come across. It just might transfigure everything.

By way of conclusion, a funny story: I’d almost finished putting together this sermon on Thursday afternoon, and I was concerned that all this talk of God smiling was a bit absurd.

And then, suddenly, I received a text from Mtr. Alane. She’d just arrived at the retreat center down in Glendale and was feeling good about her weekend ahead and randomly attached the snapshot of a picture she’d seen hanging on the wall.

And I kid you not, it was a picture of Jesus with a smile on his face.

I see what you did there, Holy Spirit. I see you, Lord.

Help us all to truly see you. Transfigure our hearts to be like yours. Help us to dance with you in that bright cloud. Give us your joy. 

The Opposite of Despair: A Sermon

I preached this sermon on Sunday, February 1, 2026 at St. Anne Episcopal Church, West Chester, OH. The lectionary texts cited are Micah 6:1-8 and Matthew 5:1-12.

We are living through difficult times. You don’t need me to tell you that.

There is division, yes, but beneath the division, I sense something even more concerning: despair. Despair that we are losing ourselves, losing each other, losing our way, and despair that there’s nothing we can do about it.

Maybe I’m just stubborn and naive but I refuse to believe that’s true. And so I’ve been thinking: what is the counter to despair? How do we resist it? Secular culture might suggest that the opposite of despair is happiness or positivity, but I think our faith teaches us something else, and it’s vital that we understand it.

So, in order to to describe what this ‘something else’ is which can save us from despair, I am going to tell you briefly about two things which may seem, at first, to be completely unrelated. 

The first ‘something’ is my grandpa’s candy dish. For the entirety of my life, there it was: a small stainless steel bowl covered by an old pink melamine saucer. It looked like something that’d been improvised on the fly one day and then just remained on the kitchen table forever. 

No matter what else changed in the world, I knew that if you went into that kitchen, there that dish would be, and you could lift up the pink saucer and find grandpa’s perennial favorite, bridge mix, an odd mixture of chocolate covered things: raisins and nuts and malted milk balls. I didn’t love bridge mix, but I did love that it was always there for anyone who wanted it. That dish became a sort of sacramental presence, like the basin of holy water you dip into in church to remind yourself of something good and lasting. It was its constancy that made it sacred, that candy dish. 

The second ‘something’ is one I hope you’ve already heard about. On August 20, 1965, an Episcopal seminarian named Jonathan Myrick Daniels was murdered by a white supremacist in Alabama. He had been volunteering in the state throughout that spring and summer, supporting the civil rights movement. On the day he died, he and his fellow activists had just been released from jail for taking part in a nonviolent protest. 

While waiting for a ride, Daniels and a few of his companions walked over to a store to buy a soft drink, but a man with a gun was blocking the entrance. The man aimed his gun at Ruby Sales, a young Black woman, and Jonathan Daniels instinctively pushed her out of the way; he was shot instead and died instantly. Daniels is honored as a martyr on the calendar of The Episcopal Church and Ruby Sales, who is still living, went on to a long ministry of faith-based activism for racial justice. 

Something that always strikes me about Daniels’ story is how simple his actions really were. He was just trying to buy a soda, and then suddenly the stakes were impossibly high. Daniels did not set out to be a martyr or a hero that day. He just followed the same habits of care and kindness that he’d been practicing for a long time. It just so happened that this time, in the face of an active evil, his kindness became sacrificial.

I think this is an important distinction to make: we remember Christian martyrs not just because they are killed, but because they refuse to stop living according to God’s values when it matters the most. In other words, it was Jonathan Myrick Daniels’ constancy that made his life sacred, not the violence which ended it.

Constancy. That is the ‘something else,’ the true alternative to despair, conveyed to me by both a candy dish and a martyr. Not happiness or positivity, but constancy. Above all else, God is interested in our constancy.  Our commitment to doing the things—often the very simple things—that God has always asked people to do, and our refusal to give up on them when the years grow long or times get tough. 

And what is it that God wants people to do? 

He has told you, O mortal, what is good;
and what does the Lord require of you

but to do justice, and to love kindness,
and to walk humbly with your God?

The prophet Micah needed people to hear: you are making this God thing too complicated. You are attempting overwrought gestures and grandiose conquests when all God actually desires is your constancy of love.  Sometimes these actions will cost you not very much at all. Some day they may cost you your own life. But the fundamental question is: will you keep offering them regardless?

I have been struck in recent weeks by the constant, faithful actions of our siblings in The Episcopal Church in Minnesota and the networks of other neighbors in that region who are supporting each other in the face of great hardship. 

Put aside policy debates for a moment and just look at the human scale of what these people are doing for each other. Outside observers have taken note, with some surprise, at how effectively all these scrappy Lutherans and Episcopalians and Catholics and people of other faiths are doing the very basic, yet suddenly prophetic actions of delivering groceries, making casseroles, offering rides, praying, sharing information, and showing up to bear witness. 

I don’t know, maybe some of these observers have never been part of a church community, especially in the midwest, but the fact of the matter is: this is the stuff we always do. Casseroles and car rides and mutual care are the bread and butter of our life together. That’s true in tranquil times, in times of personal grief, and now, it seems, in times of national, moral crisis. 

What is miraculous is not so much the nature of the actions themselves, but people’s constancy in offering these things to their neighbors even now that the wolf is at the door. The constancy of their willingness to show up, to pray, to act, to give, even when the stakes are much higher than they used to be. It is their constancy in doing justice, loving kindness, and walking humbly, as best they know how, that makes all of this sacred.

I have said this before in various ways but I am going to say it again, because I need you to hear this; I really need you to take this in as a counter to the temptation of despair: the way through the challenges of our time, and through the personal challenges we face, too, is not about some new innovative, impressive action we haven’t thought of yet. 

Look at Minnesota. Look at Jonathan Myrick Daniels. Look at my grandpa’s candy dish, for heaven’s sake: you already know exactly what love looks like! We already know how to do what love requires of us! The question is will we remain constant in doing it, regardless of the circumstances around us?

We practice this here with each other every week so that it becomes like second nature. Did you think we were just gathering at church to pass the time til Jesus comes back? No, friends. We are practicing constancy

Here’s the sacred logic of church life: we make soup for the annual Soup Supper and then, if loss or strife comes to our community, we’ll know how to make soup for those who grieve or for our vulnerable neighbors. And then, by God, if the apocalypse comes we will keep making soup even as the world falls down, just to spite the devil.

You see, those forces of evil—the ones that tempt us to despair—would love for us to think that the real solution to our collective problem is something big and dramatic and remarkable, something far sexier than soup or car rides or common kindness. Because then we would do nothing and content ourselves with waiting for someone else to come in and fix it all. 

But there isn’t anyone else. Blessed are you, Jesus says. Blessed are you, just as you are, poor and mournful and meek. Empowered are you for this work. There is only us and what we have and what we know how to do, with God’s help and with constancy. And Jesus says that it is enough. We just have to keep at it. 

Blessed are the ones who keep at it.

So, whatever you do, do not read the news and sit back and throw up your hands and say, “oh what am I to do, what are any of us to do?”

He has told you, O mortal, what is good;
and what does the Lord require of you

but to do justice, and to love kindness,
and to walk humbly with your God?

There’s only one question: will we do it?!

If you need help figuring out what that looks like in practice, open your church bulletin, go to the back, and pick something. And do it. And keep doing it. Keep praying, keep serving, keep showing up, no matter what happens next.

Like my grandpa, or Jonathan Myrick Daniels, or our friends in Minnesota, we will keep offering our small, necessary, transformative acts of love, together.

And in our constancy, our lives will be made sacred, too. In our constancy, the world may still struggle, and divisions may persist, and we may weep.

But there will be no room for despair.